- #Steermouse vs usb overdrive drivers
- #Steermouse vs usb overdrive upgrade
- #Steermouse vs usb overdrive Pc
- #Steermouse vs usb overdrive professional
And, I still need a football field to be able to click the user picture on the login screen where I CANNOT adjust the setting. My desk is not large enough to allow moving the mouse from the left to the right with OS X standard settings. So NO, this is NOT a question of getting used to it. So don't bother playing around with the settings but get USB Overdrive or Speedmouse (which I prefer) and consider this another Apple tax.
#Steermouse vs usb overdrive Pc
Steermouse vs usb overdrive Pc#Īnd don't care what other people say to justify this STUPID AND USELESS OS X settings.īy the way, I can accept there are different standards in Win and OS X, and I'm getting used to it although I'm using a PC 12 hours a day and a Mac another 2 hours or so. If it's getting too hard I use some tools to change modifier key etc. God, why do people in these threads still insist opinion is fact? But the mouse speed and acceleration range is just STUPID and USELESS (I didn't say that before, did I). In my empirical, not-backed-up-by-actual-knowledge-of-the-acceleration-curves experience, Windows has a flatter acceleration curve than the Mac. Every Windows computer I've ever used has had the sensitivity jacked through the roof, in order to provide quick long-distance movement at (IMHO) the expense of short-distance precision. My Mac-trained muscles overshoot everything on such a setup. That's because, on a Mac, to move a long distance you move the mouse a lot faster than you would to move a short distance this doesn't work out so hot on Windows. I crank the sensitivity down on Windows to compensate for this, but it's never perfect. Of course, most Windows users I know who sit down in front of a Mac immediately jack the sensitivity way up in order to more closely approximate their accustomed long-distance mousing speed. This doesn't work out so hot either, because they then have no short-distance precision to speak of. There is no good solution to this but a willingness to practice and acclimatize. In my subjective opinion, the Mac curve provides a better balance between quick long-distance movement and short-distance precision than does the Windows curve.
SM has the ability to automatically move the cursor to the default selection, UO does not.View image here: -Īlso, in my experience, Logitech mice are extremely sensitive.
SM has an option to pull up the task switcher which I use a lot.
#Steermouse vs usb overdrive professional
SM suffers a little bit from poor English translation but has a nicer and more professional appearance.
Although UO is a one off cost and SM charges for major upgrades, SM only has these upgrades extremely infrequently. UO has the advantage of being compatible with any device but at this stage I can't imagine using it for anything else.
#Steermouse vs usb overdrive upgrade
I think SM was quicker to publish a Yosemite update, this is important to me because I upgrade to new OS X versions promptly. It looks like SM is updated more frequently than UO. I am currently testing Steermouse (SM) but haven't tried USB Overdrive (UO) I have done some research and this is what I have discovered, please correct me if I'm wrong or add your own thoughts.
#Steermouse vs usb overdrive drivers
They still haven't updated the drivers for Yosemite and I'm sick of waiting, not being able to use all the features of my mouse. I have a Logitech Performance MX mouse and it looks like Logitech has abandoned support for OS X. So tell me about the difference between USB Overdrive and Steermouse? I know there have been a number of threads about this before but they are all quite old now and I wanted up to date information.
0 kommentar(er)
